In reply to Timleedude
Hi Tim,
Happy to share the details. The quote is arranged through Novari — they have a "Global Office" desk in Tokyo specifically for overseas owners, English speaking, and they understand the non-resident situation properly (no Japanese bank account, no residence card, no Japanese phone — none of that was a problem, I pay by my UK credit card and documents get posted to my UK address). A Japanese friend found them for me.
My quote: about ¥410,000 for 5 years paid as one lump sum, and that includes fire AND earthquake, plus wind, theft, water damage and personal liability. So roughly in the same ballpark as your $2500 quote but with earthquake included.
Couple of things I learned along the way that might be useful:
Earthquake cover in Japan is a government-standardised add-on and it's capped at 50% of the fire sum by law, with every insurer. So no policy will ever cover the full rebuild for earthquake, that's just how the system works here. The reason I still took it: a standard fire policy EXCLUDES fires caused by earthquakes. Given the age of these houses and the neighbourhoods they sit in, that exclusion bothered me more than the premium did.
The big one for people like us though is vacancy. Most Japanese insurers will exclude or refuse claims on a house that sits unoccupied for months, which is exactly our situation. I got it confirmed in writing that the cover stays fully valid with the house empty for long stretches. It that was my number one question before anything else, and I'd make it yours too whoever you go with.
Also check whether the quote is on replacement-cost basis (新価) rather than depreciated value (時価) — for old houses the difference is enormous. Mine is replacement cost, though the full payout on a total loss is conditional on actually rebuilding, which seems standard.
The other provider I tried (MailMate) only does one-year renewable policies and wouldn't give me a quote until I signed up to their service first, so I couldn't even compare. The 5-year lump sum locks the price in and means no annual renewal admin from abroad, which suits me better.
One honest caveat on price: my house is lightweight steel frame, not all wood, and your realtor is right that all-wood houses cost more to insure, so your number may come out higher than mine.
One more thing worth knowing — earthquake insurance here is priced by region, and I just looked up Saitama and it is in the highest rate band (the whole greater Tokyo area is, because of the anticipated big Kanto quakes). Kitakyushu is in the cheapest band, it's considered one of the lower-risk parts of Japan!! Not zero risk — Fukuoka had a magnitude 7 in 2005 but it is till much farther north than even Fukuoka— so the premium difference is real, so that's another reason your earthquake quote will likely come out higher than mine for the same cover.
And I haven't actually paid yet — I'm buying next month with cover starting October as I had to save up first, so I'll report back if anything surprises me at signing.